• 摄艳|花开红树乱莺啼 白鹭相亲相爱嬉戏忙 2019-06-01
  • 仓颉故里:南乐迎来县域电商发展新机遇 2019-06-01
  • 淮安市:阳光信访网络时代的社会治理新路径 2019-05-31
  • 香蕉-热门标签-华商生活 2019-05-17
  • 在深入推动长江经济带发展座谈会上的讲话 2019-04-30
  • 言而无信似乎成了特朗普政府的特质与标致 2019-04-25
  • 李沁出游暖萌喂鹿 笑靥如花欢快荡秋千 2019-04-25
  • 习近平教我们认识和把握世界大势和时代潮流 2019-04-17
  • 外卖小哥:高温下订单量激增一倍 收入破万元 2019-04-17
  • 为什么孩子特别不喜欢承认错误?是因为他们没意识到错了吗? 2019-04-13
  • 2018年石家庄高中招生计划出炉,家有中考生的快收藏! 2019-04-13
  • 不理解英语为什么要赖着高考。中国若与日、俄、韩、澳、印等国联合办高校,日、俄等国语种同等重要,而且,语种与专业是挂勾的 2019-04-10
  • 印度尼西亚一华人老板娘卖叉烧肉面成网红 2019-03-29
  • 游戏主播GodV韦神即兴演唱 这一声假音听的人都酥了 2019-03-29
  • 关于分类推进人才评价机制改革的实施意见 2019-03-19
  • Fuzzing in QA: finding previously undiscovered security vulnerabilities

    Fuzzing as a fundamental software security test

    群英会跨度走势图 www.xxnr.net The goal of fuzzing is to perform an exhaustive analysis and uncover new and unknown vulnerabilities in applications, files and hardware. True fuzzing does not work from a pre-designed set of test cases, look for certain attack signatures or attempt to locate known vulnerabilities in products.

    Fuzzing is used during the development process (in the QA phase) to automatically discover the security holes that remain in the product, allowing the developer to fix those vulnerabilities before the product is shipped. For use in enterprise, a fuzzer must be an automated tool that does an exhaustive search of input combinations to test for weaknesses. To cover all input combinations is not practical for complicated products. So fuzzing must be based on prioritization algorithms to focus on inputs that are likely to 'trigger' a security hole.

    Although there is a nearly infinite number of possible inputs to any given application, certain inputs that are likely to lead to the exposure of a security hole can be isolated. This is what security researchers do. However, this is a costly procedure requiring expertise and time. Developers don’t have that time, even if they have the funds. And yet, if not done by the developer some smart hacker with plenty of time on their hands will do the fuzzing for the fame and glory that comes with finding such security holes.

    Making fuzzing automatic and removing the need for security expertise, is vital for standardizing the security checking phase of product development.

    Fuzzing goals

    There is an obvious need for enterprise grade fuzzing tools. Developers must apply this technology before release – because it is certain that many will use them on products after release.

    Fuzzing before release is vital because application developers are not experts in writing secure code that is resilient to malicious intent. There are hundreds of scripts whose purpose is to break the security barriers posed by existing applications. This creates a situation where vendors must now regularly check whether its product can be attacked.

    Automated fuzzing replaces manual testing

    An application with about half a million lines of code will take 500 days to assess by a security specialist scanning over eight hundred lines of code per day. This could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. And this process needs to be repeated whenever a new version of the product comes out, which can be several times a year. There is a clear need for fuzzing tools that will automate this.

    Due to time constraints many vendors release their products prior to conducting a proper security audit, exposing their customers to potential vulnerabilities. This is becoming unacceptable to customers who now demand that vendors conduct security testing of their products prior to deployment or purchase.

    When a security vulnerability is discovered after product delivery, a major problem arises - the vendor has the responsibility to fix the problem in the field without causing damage to the customer’s systems. But vulnerabilities are discovered daily. As hackers get better at finding vulnerabilities, and the number of vulnerabilities steadily increase, the rise in awareness on the part of customers will inevitably cause them to demand higher standards of security from vendors' products.

    To summarize, there is a need for an automated fuzzing tool that provides detailed information on different types of vulnerabilities, on multiple protocols. The tool will conduct product audits, discover known and previously unknown vulnerabilities by doing a thorough test of all possible combinations, and allow for prioritization. All this, without consuming excessive time or resources.

    This is where beSTORM enters the picture.

    Fuzzing, a functional description

    Fuzzing, also referred to as black box testing or dynamic application security testing (DAST), has been slow to be picked up by Developers because the tools are often are not supported and are single purpose in their design.

    To interface with an application, a file or hardware, the fuzzer will need to speak the language it uses. This language is the protocol. In many cases a fuzzer may have been created to test a single protocol. Beyond Security’s beSTORM uses modules to do this. These modules are programmed per known protocol standards such as HTTP, FTP, SMTP, IMAP, POP3, DNS, DHCP or VOIP. More than 200 modules are programmed to accommodate nearly every protocol.

    Use of these modules provides two key benefits: First, it simplifies the adjustments needed to test each new product. For example, most network devices use HTTP. Regardless of whether the network device uses a known web server for HTTP communication or if the programmers developed an HTTP-compatible application from scratch, the same module can be used for fuzzing.

    Second, fuzzing modules facilitate quantification of the level of security of the product. By systematically checking the application, we can indicate how secure a certain product really is, by measuring the number of checks we have done compared with other products in the same category. This enables an actual security certification of products, based on an objective and automated scaling - as opposed to today's manual and error-prone evaluation.

    A typical fuzzing application

    Based on the protocol used by the target application, the correct module is selected. The user will then set beSTORM to monitor the target and provide the necessary details for the attack: IP address and port (if the attack is on a remote machine). The attack can be paused and resumed. A status bar indicates the current test that is being done, and the percentage of the attack that has been completed.

    Most vulnerabilities that a full scale manual test might ever reveal are often discovered within the first 24 hours of fuzzing. The full test is expected to take several days to several weeks - depending on the size and complexity of the application and processing power available. Distributed capabilities enable to shorten this time considerably by sharing the task between multiple machines. In any event, the fuzzing is completely automated and requires no manual intervention.

    For more information, please call, email, or use the form on this page.

    For More Info re:
    Fuzzing in QA

  • 摄艳|花开红树乱莺啼 白鹭相亲相爱嬉戏忙 2019-06-01
  • 仓颉故里:南乐迎来县域电商发展新机遇 2019-06-01
  • 淮安市:阳光信访网络时代的社会治理新路径 2019-05-31
  • 香蕉-热门标签-华商生活 2019-05-17
  • 在深入推动长江经济带发展座谈会上的讲话 2019-04-30
  • 言而无信似乎成了特朗普政府的特质与标致 2019-04-25
  • 李沁出游暖萌喂鹿 笑靥如花欢快荡秋千 2019-04-25
  • 习近平教我们认识和把握世界大势和时代潮流 2019-04-17
  • 外卖小哥:高温下订单量激增一倍 收入破万元 2019-04-17
  • 为什么孩子特别不喜欢承认错误?是因为他们没意识到错了吗? 2019-04-13
  • 2018年石家庄高中招生计划出炉,家有中考生的快收藏! 2019-04-13
  • 不理解英语为什么要赖着高考。中国若与日、俄、韩、澳、印等国联合办高校,日、俄等国语种同等重要,而且,语种与专业是挂勾的 2019-04-10
  • 印度尼西亚一华人老板娘卖叉烧肉面成网红 2019-03-29
  • 游戏主播GodV韦神即兴演唱 这一声假音听的人都酥了 2019-03-29
  • 关于分类推进人才评价机制改革的实施意见 2019-03-19
  • 安徽快3个位走势图 无措全三个半单双中特 五分彩后一计划软件 竟彩篮球即时比分 广西11选5基本走势 辽宁十一选五开奖 福彩3d字谜图谜总汇太湖解析 e球彩中奖规则十月属 中国足彩网积分抽奖 双彩网湖北快三走势图 爱彩通浙江11选5软件 山东体彩大奖怎么领奖 体彩p3今晚试机号是多少 河南十一选五开奖结果走势图表 黑龙江十一选五走势图正好网